This article have a common title and the content inside is too complicated to understand for publics. I think the author wants to draw audience concern in how the video games can bring the negative effects to the teenagers. However they did not focus on the games, they just showed the academic research about giving the test to people to watch the violent movies and even give them an electron shock. This article reports in a high content way which means not direct enough, I think there are some ways to make it better.On the other hand, the body of the news is quite good individually, it gives us new concepts about violent, the evidence in the article is powerful.
This article can help more parents and teenagers themselves to understand more about what violent environment is. The violent video games and clips are not only funny, they harms teenagers in mentally. The new and fresh idea that not everyone knows will give reader awareness.
For the other audiences, it shows a signal. Even they are over eighteen, the violent can cause incredible consequences to them and the society.
The article is written to the public, the effort used in can be good examples. It gives the incontestable reference to the topic. The content is related to most people and most important is it showed another perspective on the topic.
Despite the fact that the topic of this article is not match the body, the content is useful and the way author used to write has a credit. It is worth to read and spend a little time to think about the topic.
No comments:
Post a Comment